Editor-checked fictional revised project plan — after T1–T4, before H1
Include A quick search and C2 wording/sequence guidance.
Effort: A=4/1/1; C2=4/2/1 in engineering/design/QA person-days. Total 8/3/2, thirteen days.
Cost: 13×200,000=KRW 2,600,000; budget remaining KRW 1,000,000.
Capacity 12/4/2 leaves 4/1/0. No QA headroom to justify adding another shipped feature.
Defer B+M: with mandatory A, 11/3/3 and excess QA. Defer D: with A,12/2/3, excess QA and unknown supplier schedule.
Sequence: A work→A QA; C2 work→C2 QA; release decision after both checks. Parallel allocation and calendar dates are unconfirmed.
Change: A+B→A+C2 due to blocked saving T1 and repair/additional QA T2. Equal costs conceal different scope.
Verification: retest payment confusion in C2. Do not ship B before repair M and a keyboard-only saving check.
Evidence: S1's32 tickets are not deduplicated users; S2's20/50 are sessions. Neither demonstrates effects or population rates.
Under H1: seven engineering days make A+C2 exceed capacity by one. Retain A alone,4/1/1,six days,KRW1,200,000. Defer C2/B+M/D.